“Global Warming” Models Need Update After Study Finds Ocean Traps Twice As Much Carbon

Global warming computer prediction models are only as good as their input, and it appears they need more adjusting. A new study has found the ocean’s biological pump captures twice as much carbon as previously thought.

Measurements of carbon captured in the ocean should be taken where the ocean’s sunlit zone disappears, the study says. Previous models used 450 feet as a set reference depth, but the new study took into account the true variable depth between 100 and 550 feet.

How it works: Plankton die or are consumed in a daily cycle that moves carbon from the from the surface to the deep ocean. A “marine snowfall” occurs trapping most of the ocean’s carbon in deep waters where it is stored for hundreds to thousands of years.

Read more on the study at The Conversation.com

Graphic courtesy Oak Ridge National Laboratory

Continue reading
0 Comments

Challenger to the San Andreas Fault

Geologist James Faulds believes he has found a new outlet for built up seismic tension in the U.S. southwest, called the Walker Lane.

The San Andreas fault could be jammed, resulting in 25 percent of recent seismic activity in California happening along the Walker Lane. Read more at Wired.com

OPPOSING THEORY TO PLATE TECTONICS

An Expanding Earth Theory from Neal Adams provides a better explanation on how the continents once fit together (See the animated presentation on Youtube.)

Continue reading
0 Comments

The Future of Eye Repair

Well done video infographic on a future eye-healing medical technology.

Scientists are hoping a tiny nano-scaled, 3d-printed, nonstick-coated, spiral-shaped delivery bot (200 times smaller than the diameter of a human hair) can replace slow, irritating and painful procedures to deliver medicine to the back of the eye and the retina.

It will be years before the nanobots are ready for human testing. First is animal testing and finding how to dissolve the bots once their task is complete.

Read more on the technique at Scienceemag.org

Continue reading
0 Comments

Hurricane Data Misrepresentation

Meteorologists often compare current data to incomplete past data to justify global climate taxation and one-world power structures.

However, in the early Twentieth Century and prior, scientists relied on less reliable methods of storm tracking, like witness accounts from ships or islands.

(Marked in blue is information the meteorologists leave out)

Continue reading
0 Comments